The Gospel Truth

Armageddon Was Yesterday…Today We Have a…

November 5, 2010

In the first leg, The Girl With Dragon Tattoo, of the late Stieg Larsson’s trilogy, the main character Lisbeth Salander wore a tee-shirt that said, Armageddon was yesterday…today we have a serious problem.

I thought it would be a perfect quote for the 2010 election.

I had lived the last few months in severe trepidation.  I knew that the future of our country and even that of my family could hang in the balance.

While I am not certain last night was an Armageddon but it certainly did shake the rafters of the Democratic Party.

The First Minnesota

Left too many Democrats standing

To me the important part of the saying is the second part.  The ball is now in the Republicans’ court and they better do something more than dribble all over the place.

Also they should NOT take the results as a vindication of their past policies.

Obama’s mantra of the past few years, the failed policies of the past rang true—to the degree that they were almost indistinguishable from those that he was offering.

Bush’s tax cuts were not the problem.

In fact along with Alito and Roberts, they were the highlights of his eight years in office.

No, Bush and some many of his neo-con advisers had adopted the big-spending policies of the left in order to curry favor with the voters.

Whose voters I ask?

Certainly not people like me?

Their past history should have told them that a me-too kind of approach to big government and profligate spending would only insure a ballot box rejection.

Bush’s Republicans had forgotten their base and it took a new movement, the Spirit of ‘76 from the Tea Party goers to rejuvenate their base.


The Spirit of '76 makes its point

While there were disappointments in Nevada, Delaware and maybe Alaska, the basic ideas of the Tea Party people won and won big.

The Tea Party movement was unlike any that I can remember in political history.

It provided the human juice and energy that pulsated through the veins of the electorate last night.

Unlike most other third party movements, their leaders attempted to work within the framework of the two-party systems.

Had they not done so, the results of last night would have been remarkably different.

That idea reminded me of the former Tax Payer Party, now the Constitution Party.

I was a delegate to their national convention in St. Louis in 1999.

Howard Philips and my friend Joseph Sobran were the original candidates that year–I think Joe dropped out after just a few weeks.

He was more an intellect than a politician.

What disturbed me was how that they seemed more hostile toward regular Republicans than they were toward Democrats.

View Image

Tea Party people learned from his mistake

Even Sobran’s post-election columns centered more on the inadequacies of President Bush.

I thought that a foolish thing to do, since the Democratic agenda was driving us over a cultural and economic cliff at warp speeds.

What I didn’t realize was that they planned to destroy the Republican Party and resurrect a new party out of the ashes.

They was a dumb idea and was doomed to failure.

The 2010 Tea Partiers got it right.

My big personal disappointment was that Ed Martin, a fellow Holy Cross alumnus did not enjoy a resounding victory at the end of the evening. It seems that suddenly his narrow margin turned into a surprising 4,500 vote lead for Russ Carnahan.

View Image

Still fighting the good fight

Now Ed is investigating some possible examples of voter fraud that may hold up the process.

This would not surprise me in a close election.

Strange things may have happened in Nevada where Harry Reid surprised everybody with his relentless victory.

With regards to fraudulent elections, I do not accept the idea of both sides do it.

Republicans may occasionally try to beat the system, but with Democrats, it is an intricate part of their game plan.

The medieval atheists Machiavelli is one of the party’s patron saints.

Like Democrats, winning was the only thing and the means were always justified.

By for now I look forward to the next election.

By 2012 the Tea Party advocates will own the Republican Party and if they are really good it will be a party of the basic American virtues as smaller government, lower taxes, respect abroad, and secure borders.

Hopefully they will retire all the Quislings who lined up with Republicans while wearing the uniform of the opposing side–I am talking about the likes of Lisa Murkowski, and Charlie Crist and even vestigial Republicans like Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham.

I also heard Rush mention a former Nevada Republican State Chairman, who endorsed Reid over Sharron Angle. His name is Frank Fahrenkopf and he is head of one of the gaming unions.  It’s that kind of good old boy network than rings the death knell for the Republican Party.

View Image

The wave of the past

I also fear that some of these Republicans will fall victim to the promises of the president who offers the olive branch of not surrender but compromise… that is what the farmer does with the turkey until Thanksgiving.

No the Republicans need to be decisive, strong and fully determined to take the heat, not what Newt Gingrich did back in 1995.

My wife was upset with me when the probable Republican future Speaker of the House, John Boehner broke down in tears.

I was embarrassed for him and the party.

View Image

Can't let tears cloud his vision of the job ahead

Tears were the last thing that the American people needed to see from the third most important person in our government.

Boehner has to stifle his emotions, bite his lip and lead like a man, not a sensitive Beta kind of guy.

After two years of Obama, American politics has little need of the Alan Alda type of sensitive male.  Mr. Boehner should have known better.

I am watching him as are millions and millions of American voters who are looking ahead to 2012 to complete the surge that left a few Democrats standing after all was said and done last night.

If they turn their back on the Tea Party spirit, they will go the way of their predecessors, the Federalists and the Whigs.

Colonel Obama in the Parlor With the…

April 4, 2010
Leave a Comment

Easter Sunday 2010

As a child and later as a parent with young children, I always enjoyed the parlor game, CLUE.  My favorite character was the sultry Miss Scarlet or would she be Ms Scarlet today?

Well times change and I am not even sure that people have parlors any more.

One relatively new game that many Christians like to play is  what would Jesus do?

I don’t mean to trivialize any one’s valid religious faith but it seems to me that several years of Theology would be necessary to even scratch the surface of the mind of Jesus.

I have 16 credits of Theology, which is more than most people this side of a seminary and I would not venture to assume that I could fathom the Divine mysteries of the Incarnation.

I still haven’t figured my wife out after nearly 44 years of marriage, so what chances do I have to know what Jesus would do 2000 years removed from Nazareth?

I will say that Jesus’ approach to His culture was not revolutionary as some claim today but much more paradoxical.

There is currently a growing secular variation on the WWJD parlor game, called What Political Party Would Jesus Belong To?

To my mind liberals conceived this game and are the only ones who know how to play it.

I seriously doubt that Jesus would belong to either party since he was not interested in aggrandizing His own political power but merely with opening the Gates of Heaven for those who would love Him and do His will.

My good friend, Joseph Sobran, probably the most unsung writer in the history of political and religious commentary, nailed it in one of his beautifully written essays.

In writing about liberal Catholic author, Garry Wills, probably the most overrated Catholic author on the docket, Joe said, Wills assures us that Jesus, if he were among us today, would be partial to gays.

Joe points out that Wills cites not a single verse or word in the gospels, or any other part of Scripture, to support this peculiar view. I guess the Bible is not necessary to play this game.

Joe’s superior erudition prompted him to compare Wills to the Tolstoy character who chooses his opinions as he selects his clothes — according to mere fashion.

In another prescient comment Joe points out that Wills also holds that abortion is a woman’s right, never mind that the one of the earliest surviving Christian documents, the Didache, which may well express the thinking of the Apostles, flatly forbids abortion (as does the Hippocratic oath.)

Even my buddy Duane, the Erstwhile Conservative thinks that left-wing political activist, the Reverend Jim Wallis is more Christ-like than self-professed Christians and Catholics, Anne Coulter, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck. (I think Mormons count themselves as Christians and Beck is a fallen-away Catholic.)

A reader friend of mine sent me a spoof on what this potential game might look like.   I think he should patent it before the left beats him to the punch.

Here are some excerpts from his letter to me several months ago.  He wrote them in answer to local Democratic politicians who knew how to play the claiming Jesus for my side game.

Well, if Jesus were a Catholic Democrat hanging around St. Louis today, he might have a few problems with his representative on earth, Pope Benedict XVI.

Jesus would be voting for, giving money to, and working the polls for politicians who believe an unborn child is just another piece of medical waste.

He would knock on doors and convince other Catholics to look the other way on social issues and support the party of JFK and FDR, since it’s OK to be “personally opposed, but”.

Jesus would attend Mass on Sunday morning and hear the priest say that marriage is between a man and a woman, and then march in the Gay Pride parade and advocate for gay marriage on Sunday afternoon because the party requires it.

He would work the fish fry during lent, and then vote to allow human embryos to be used and destroyed in medical research because of the long shot chance it might produce local jobs and unspecified, “cures”.

If Jesus had kids, whom most Catholic Democrats do, he would send them to Catholic grade school, struggle to pay the tuition of SLU, Nerinx, St. Joe or CBC, and possibly further struggle to send them to “Catholic” colleges.

He would then wonder why his kids don’t practice the faith, or even the version he practices.

Catholic Democrat Jesus may grow old and pass away, but he won’t go directly to Heaven as before.  He will make a side trip to Purgatory for further reflection.

Personally I think that the rules in the WPPWJBT must state that most left-wingers believe that Jesus would be a liberal who would spend most of his time dreaming up all the social programs and political moves that Jesus could do, like taxing the rich to feed the hungry, disarming to insure for world peace and paling around with a bunch of gay men in robes.

A liberal Jesus would probably be the spitting image of Martin Scorsese’s Jesus in the ridiculous 1988 movie, The Last Temptation of Christ.   I rented it years ago and was amazed at how silly the entire film was.

I mean the troubled Catholic director cast David Bowie  as Pontius Pilate, and Harvey Keitel whose Judas favored more a Mafia hitman than he did the greatest betrayer  in world history…until Bart Stupak.  (OK that’s a cheap shop.)

Willem Dafoe, an accomplished actor, whose best flirtation with Christ was probably his dramatic death scene in the Oliver Stone film, Platoon, was the most improbable Jesus I have ever seen.

(He was more convincing in army camouflage than white robes.)

I will admit that some Jesus portrayals, such as Jeffrey Hunter in The King of Kings were somewhat plastic and robotic but compared to Mel’s movie,   Scorcese’s Jesus was more like a cross between Clarabell of the Howdy Doody Show and Harpo Marx.

Dafoe’s Christ wandered aimlessly around the multitude uttering the traditional Bible verses with the reverence and solemnity of Pee Wee Herman or even Bill Maher.

On Good Friday I picketed the local abattoir with a group of committed Christians that would have serious trouble with Jesus working to support  abortion rights and Planned Parenthood.

I honestly think that Jesus was there with us holding a sign to protest this terrible destruction of His human creatures.

I wonder if this will all lead to a game about president Obama, that might be called Clueless in DC?  One result might be that President Obama does in the Republican party with the Poison Pen in the White House parlor.

About author

After graduating from Holy Cross, Bill Borst earned an MA in Asian History from St. John's University and a Ph.D in American History from St. Louis University. (1972) A former New Yorker, he taught for many years in the St. Louis area, while also hosting a weekly radio show on WGNU from 1984-2006. He currently is a regular substitute for conservative Phyllis Schlafly on KSIV radio. (1320) He is the author of two books on social history, "Liberalism: Fatal Consequences," and "The Scorpion and the Frog: A Natural Conspiracy." He just retired as the Features editor of the Mindszenty Foundation Monthly Report. In his 11 years from 2003-2013 he wrote nearly 130 essays on Catholic culture and world affairs. Many in St. Louis also know him as the "Baseball Professor," because of a course that he offered at Maryville College from 1973-74. It was arguably the first fully-accredited baseball history course in the Midwest.The author of several short books on the old St. Louis Browns, he started the St. Louis Browns Historical Society in 1984. In 2009 his first two plays were produced on the local stage. "The Last Memory of an Ol' Brownie Fan," ran six performances at the Sound Stage in Crestwood and "A Perfect Choice" ran for two performances at the Rigali Center Theater in Shrewsberry. His third play, "A Moment of Grace," ran six performances at DeSmet High School in January of 2011with First Run Theater in January of 2011. He is currently working on a 4th play, "A Family Way," which is a comedy about a happy dysfunctional family. He can reached at