The Gospel Truth

The Gift of Tongues | October 16, 2013

Two of the  more enduring images of the Bible are the gift of tongues and the Tower of Babel.

Priestly gifts and this would include Pope Francis have often been blessed with such spiritual and physical gifts as the gifts of speech, the gift of tongues interpretation and  prophecy.

The Tower of Babel refers to a story in Genesis.

According to this first book in the Old Testament, Moses related the story that after the Great Flood, a united humanity appeared from a land in the east called Shinar that spoke a universal language.

They resolved to build a city with a tower whose top may reach unto heaven.

This way they could make a name for themselves lest they be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

Because their intention was egotistically motivated because of the vanity of their nation, God came down from above and made their speech unintelligible.

Thus they were scattered over the face of the earth.

A confusion of tongues

I think if a priest, especially a new and green pontiff were not extremely careful he could run the risk of turning discussion of the Catholic faith into an occasion of confusion and misunderstanding.

Pope Francis has said many thing since his becoming pope last April that have upset and even confused many of the faithful.

Of course his statements gave hope to the liberal wing of the Church.

Quite frankly I can understand the concern that many Orthodox Catholic have with his pronouncements.

The first statement that concerned me was when he told Catholics that as a Church we cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods…

I hadn’t realized that was what we were doing.

In fact from the pulpit one hardly ever hears about the evils of abortion, euthanasia or homosexuality.

The pope did state that we had to  talk about them in context.

I submit that is exactly what we are doing when we do talk about these issues.

The context is a culture war that was started by the Marxists, dating back to Sardinian communist, Antonio Gramsci, who ordained a long march through western culture in the early 1920s.

The advent of the culture war was predicted many years  ago by Russian author Igor Shafarevich, whoreduced the Communist Manifesto’s 10 planks to three specific targets, which were private property, the Christian religion and the family.

The pope seems to have failed to note that these basic human institution that have provided the moral and physical glue for Western Civilization have been under vicious assault for many generations.

Another statement that turned a few devout heads was when the pope opined on women in the church.

Has turned a few heads as well

Of course this is a loaded question that the last four popes have had to walk on cracked eggshells to address.

The pope suggested that the feminine genius is needed whenever we make important decisions.

While that sounds like a nice, even flattering thing to say about the gentle sex…especially the part about the feminine genius, what does it mean in the context of  Church teaching?

Well for starters I am sure  someone longing for a female priesthood could seriously reason that women should become ordained because they could then apply this genius, which I wish he had defined, to the important decisions that priests make each and every day.

Then the pontiff was asked what the Church’s role in the modern world.

 

He answered that what the church needs most today ability to heal wounds and warm the hearts of the faithful.

 

The pope offered the image of the Church as a field hospital.

 

I am not at all certain what he means by that but it does not seem to agree with mu childhood and adolescent understanding of the what the Catholic Church was supposed to stand for?

I guess I fear that we will fast become a church of social workers.

 

 

 

I have to stifle my urge to laugh or make a glib remark because he is our pope but I always thought that the church’s divinely ordained role was to lead the faithful to heaven.

Unless the pope is a believer in universal salvation, which was declared a heresy 120 years ago, that’s the only thing that counts.

As Hillary Clinton likes to say among the ruins of our foreign policy, what difference…does it make….if you gain or heal the entire world and suffer the loss of your immortal soul?

 

Nothing...nada...if the church is relinquishing this primary function why do we really need a church?

Pope Francis in March 2013.jpg

Has the purpose changed?

 

There are plenty of medical and psychology organizations who will heal wounds and warm hearts.

Then there is the issue of Liberation Theology.

I have written about it for the Mindszenty Foundation and am scheduled in March to talk about it in Chicago for them as well.

Basically it is a relatively new teaching about the poor, especially in Latin America where it originated well over 40 years ago.

It has led to such derivatives as the so-called preferential option for the poor and an obsession for helping the poor no matter what the means.

This has essentially led to trillions of dollars in spending that has been borrowed from America’s future .

This is standing G. K. Chesterton’s idea of the democracy of the dead where traditions and customs of the past must be recognized as still valuable.

With today’s leaders we have the tyranny of the living.

My additional research has uncovered the fact that Liberation Theology was essentially the idea of the KGB and the Soviet’s attempt to undermine its chief antagonist, the Catholic Church.

Attack on the Church

Personally I think you could trace it back to the ideas of the Enlightenment in the 18th century, which sought to do away with religion, royalty and the middle class.

Pope Francis is considered the pope of the poor.

So when he became pontiff many on the left assumed that he would jump right in on their behalf and support Liberation Theology.

My guess is that the only thing that has held him back is that its proponents make no excuses for the necessary violence that is left in the wake of this powerful abstraction.

Behind the growing skepticism is the fear in some quarters that Francis’s all-embracing style and spontaneous speech, so open as it is to interpretation, are undoing decades of church efforts to speak clearly on Catholic teachings.

Some conservatives also feel that the pope is undermining them at a time when they are already being sidelined by an increasingly secular culture.

Francis is certainly a lot different at least in the beginning than both of his predecessors.

During the previous three decades, popes John Paul II and Benedict had a similar focus. Each wanted to make orthodox teachings crystal clear so Catholics would not get confused or lost what Benedict XVI called the slavery of relativism.

181051_593590320668633_1035994508_n

All the same focus?

That is precisely the risk Pope Francis has been running since his rise to the throne of Peter.

We all need to pray that his gift of tongues does not degenerate into a new kind of theological babel and misunderstanding.

The stakes are just too high!

Advertisements

7 Comments »

  1. […] Recommended Article FROM https://bbprof.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/the-gift-of-tongues/ […]

    Pingback by The Gift of Tongues | ChristianBookBarn.com — October 16, 2013 @ 7:47 pm

  2. BB, Although he has said many things causing controversy, he has not changed ANY DOCTRINE and will not . Unless he is the promised anti- Christ foretold to us in several places. So far he has not claimed to be God. And he does have people talking. Love, Mary

    Comment by Mary B. Lachney — October 16, 2013 @ 11:21 pm

    • Dear Mary:

      I agree with you that confusing or “shooting from the lip” seems to be more a result of his genuine simplicity, trusting nature and deep concern for all humans. Perhaps he will learn the way the PR game is played soon and not lend himself open to such misinterpretation or misunderstanding. By the way I should tell you that December’s MR will mark my 128th and last Report for the Cardinal Mindszenty Foundation. As one of my really faithful and interested readers I thought you should know because I doubt there will be any official mention of me or even my successor who is tanned and ready to go. I will continue to post my blog though on a more irregular basis than the weekly schedule where I have published 205 posts. I hope you liked the last one…it was probably one of my biggest and most popular successes. November’s on Burke and Chesterton is in the can as they say and I have already outlined December. God bless and do continue to keep in touch. BB

      ________________________________

      Comment by Bill Borst — October 24, 2013 @ 7:29 pm

  3. Bill –
    Not to worry – too much. The Holy Spirit does guide the Church. I had (and have) some of the same reservations. But I gleaned clarifications in reading some of the interviews in full. I think I get what he is saying. He also said that he’s flakey and disorganized. Well, I can identify. Benedict was the epitome of careful-ness in speech, yet even he got hijacked by the worldly press (see Regensburg).
    We lay a lot on our pontiffs. They almost aren’t allowed to be human. And we often expect their pronouncements to be so appealing that even the press corps will be converted. This won’t happen. Christ’s Church will always be fighting what appears to be a rear-guard action. Yet, if we step back, we can see that we continue to Christianize the world.
    Pray for him – and for our Church. And I know that you do.

    Comment by John Kelly — October 21, 2013 @ 3:42 pm

  4. Bill,
    Sorry it took me so long to read this. I think this pope has done some wonderful things so far and will accomplish a lot. He’s not a heretic, is not undermining pro-life efforts, just warning against the politicizing of those efforts.

    Comment by jakubspen — October 24, 2013 @ 5:39 pm

    • Jim:

      Thanks for the comments. I don’t think Pope Francis is a heretic by any means but I do think he has a tendency to say confusing things that taken even in context sometimes can confuse the faithful and I believe give false hope to the left-wing and bordering heretics.

      ________________________________

      Comment by Bill Borst — October 24, 2013 @ 7:21 pm

  5. Bill you wouldn’t be the first or the last being confused.
    Imagine what Traditional and Conservitave Catholics would have thought to see him kneeling before an Episcopalian pastor, with his hand over his heart and head bowed while all the hallelujahs hands raised assisted by a Franciscan friar praying over him for maybe the “gifts of the Spirit” which to them, Pentecostal’s and others similiar, includes praying in tongues, visions, prophesy and whatever else.
    He’s into Medjugorje too, opening his diocese to the seer’s when forbidden to speak somewhere else, so it will be interesting what comes of that now that he is pope.

    Comment by L. Newington — November 10, 2013 @ 1:47 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About author

After graduating from Holy Cross, Bill Borst earned an MA in Asian History from St. John's University and a Ph.D in American History from St. Louis University. (1972) A former New Yorker, he taught for many years in the St. Louis area, while also hosting a weekly radio show on WGNU from 1984-2006. He currently is a regular substitute for conservative Phyllis Schlafly on KSIV radio. (1320) He is the author of two books on social history, "Liberalism: Fatal Consequences," and "The Scorpion and the Frog: A Natural Conspiracy." He just retired as the Features editor of the Mindszenty Foundation Monthly Report. In his 11 years from 2003-2013 he wrote nearly 130 essays on Catholic culture and world affairs. Many in St. Louis also know him as the "Baseball Professor," because of a course that he offered at Maryville College from 1973-74. It was arguably the first fully-accredited baseball history course in the Midwest.The author of several short books on the old St. Louis Browns, he started the St. Louis Browns Historical Society in 1984. In 2009 his first two plays were produced on the local stage. "The Last Memory of an Ol' Brownie Fan," ran six performances at the Sound Stage in Crestwood and "A Perfect Choice" ran for two performances at the Rigali Center Theater in Shrewsberry. His third play, "A Moment of Grace," ran six performances at DeSmet High School in January of 2011with First Run Theater in January of 2011. He is currently working on a 4th play, "A Family Way," which is a comedy about a happy dysfunctional family. He can reached at bbprof@sbcglobal.net

Search

Navigation

Categories:

Links:

Archives:

Feeds

%d bloggers like this: